Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Glickman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maria Rosenthal appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying her petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. Rosenthal had sought relief from the denial of certain motions she had filed in the Appeals Court for *1002enlargement of time for filing an appellate brief.1 We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Maria Rosenthal, pro se.

The Appeals Court allowed Rosenthal’s first three motions for extensions of time, but denied her fourth and subsequent motions. When Rosenthal failed to file her brief, the Appeals Court dismissed the appeal pursuant to its Standing Order 17A. Rosenthal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rasten v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. FarleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marides v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. MELANIE CARA ERESIAN & Another v. SUPERIOR COURT IN WORCESTER COUNTY & OthersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API