Mullen v. State

Plaintiff in error was convicted of hank robbery, his maximum punishment being fixed at twenty years in the penitentiary.' He has appealed. Since the errors relied upon do not go to the facts, we shall only respond herein to the legal questions involved.

It is first insisted that the court was without jurisdiction to try the plaintiff in error on February 17, 1932, for the reason that the court was then in session at Brownsville.

On January 21, 1932, the following order was entered in this case on the minutes at Alamo, to-wit:

‘£ Came the Attorney-G-eneral to represent the plea of the State,…