Legal Opinion · Dissent

Green v. Hoefler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 12, 1946No. 15,687Published

1DissentJustice Hilliard

Disposition below was on motion of defendants in error for summary judgment, based on three grounds: (1) That plaintiff in error’s cause of action is barred by operation of section 2, chapter 122, Séssion Laws 1937, section 164 (1), chapter 40, Supp. ’35 C.S.A.; (2) that the certificate of purchase sought to be foreclosed, having once been assigned to the then owner of the property, it became merged and of no further effect; (3) that failure of plaintiff in error to record her assignment of the certificate of purchase, constitutes a bar to any relief. The court below granted the motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farr v. SemmlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hooper v. GoldsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Knox v. DotySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Goldblatt v. CannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. International Trust Co. v. RodewaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API