Legal Opinion

Mongiello v. HIGHTSTOWN

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 28, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 1 (1954)

105 A.2d 692

JENNIE MONGIELLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

BOROUGH OF HIGHTSTOWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 17, 1954.

Decided May 28, 1954.

Before Judges CLAPP, FRANCIS and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Kenneth J. Dawes argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Robert E. Dietz, attorney).

Mr. James S. Turp argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Turp and Coates, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

The question presented here is whether the Borough of Hightstown is under a duty to supply water…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Reid Development Corp. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Hackensack Water Co. v. RutaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Reigle v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API