Legal Opinion

Sandler v. Bresnaham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Bussell, J.) Beplevin. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

Action of replevin for a quantity of scrap-iron. The plaintiff resides in Grand Bapids, and claims title to the iron through a purchase made from one Snher, on January 6, 1883. It appears incidentally in the ease that defendant, when the property was taken from him on the writ in this case, was holding the property under a writ of attachment against Snher, which was levied January 10, 18S3. *568The defendant, however, did not justify under the attachment, and he seems not to have pleaded in the case.

The plaintiff had never had possession of the iron, and to show his right to maintain the suit it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Wilkinson v. HolidayMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Hahn v. FredericksMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Scotten v. SutterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De St. Aubin v. Marshall Field & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Carver v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Blodgett v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API