Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Ray A/K/A Carl Hathcock
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1985No. 84-2230PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
Charles Ray a/k/a Carl Hathcock appeals his conviction for failure to appear, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (1982). Ray asserts the district court 1 erred in three respects: (1) in denying Ray’s motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficient evidence, (2) in admitting testimony and a transcript of a witness’s prior unsworn statements as substantive evidence, and (3) in denying his motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (1982). We find that there exists sufficient evidence to support the conviction, but that it was reversible error…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mark A. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Thomas GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Jose Rosado Acha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James L. Kington and Don EarneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jelili Olaose GiwaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.