Legal Opinion
Diodato v. Turecamo Coastal & Harbor Towing Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 1984No. 82 Civ. 6997 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Turecamo Coastal & Harbor Towing, Inc. (“Turecamo”) has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 39(a)(2) to strike *757plaintiff Jack Diodato’s (“Diodato”) demand for a jury trial in this seaman’s action for personal injury. For the reasons given below, the motion is denied.
Diodato has brought suit against Turecamo, as well as the County of Westchester (“Westchester”) and Empresa Lineas Maritime Argentinas, S.A., (“Empresa”) a corporation wholly owned by the Argentinian government. Diodato was captain on the Westco No. 1 barge owned by Westchester and chartered to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Fritz Kopke, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mary E. Barger, Cross-Appellant v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Maltais v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAleer v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, Indiana on October 31, 1994District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Toups v. Du-Mar Marine Contractors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1986