Legal Opinion

Radcliff v. Coster

New York Court of Chancery

Decided July 18, 1839Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Assistant Vice-Chancellor:

The bill in this ■cause is filed to recover the sum of $17,009, awarded by the commissioners under the treaty with France of 1831, to the defendants. They were insurers upon a cargo, -owned by the complainant Roulet, and his deceased partner Mumford. The vessel was captured and carried into Amsterdam.

The case involves important questions, and has received an elaborate and able argument. Any error in my decision must spring from an inability to discern the truth, not from the omission of counsel to display it.

It has been argued upon two grounds: First, as to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Fisher v. New-York Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Peeks v. Merchants' Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
  4. Hosack v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  5. Walden v. Phœnix InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API