Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On certiorari in matter of road.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Werts, J.

The prosecutor of the two writs of certiorari was road overseer of district No. 1, in Woolwich township, Gloucester county. The respondent Bradshaw resided in district No. 1. The respondent Batten resided in district No. 2, same township and county.

In the year 1887 a new road was laid out by surveyors of the highways in the townships of Woolwich and Harrison, Gloucester county, and subsequently the prosecutor was, by writ of mandamus, commanded to open the road. The portion of the road in Woolwich township is wholly in district No. 1. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  2. Wallace v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinmonth v. Township CommitteeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API