Legal Opinion
A.R.T. Ltd. v. Simpson
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 30, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Tompkins, J.
Defendants move pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) and subdivision (6) of section 19 of the Lien Law to *663dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint and discharge plaintiffs’ mechanic’s lien. Plaintiffs cross-move for an order declaring their lien effective and for summary judgment.
On or about June 27, 1980, the plaintiff Fassy and Simpson entered into an agreement whereby Fassy would provide architectural services to Simpson’s apartment. After resubmission of his plans, Fassy retained plaintiffs A.R.T., Ltd., and Marcel Berkowitz as cabinet work contractors. On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pascual v. Greenleaf Park Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Geiger Roofing Co. v. ThompsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- HamiltonAir Co. v. GouldCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007