Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1990No. A047006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

On appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence following a negotiated guilty plea, appellant Michael Howard Williams contends that the trial court erred in imposing a restitution fine because the court failed to advise appellant that the fine was a consequence of his plea. We agree and order that the restitution fine be stricken from the judgment.

Procedural Background

Because there is only one narrow legal issue on appeal, a brief summary of the procedure below will suffice. The amended notice of appeal specifies that this appeal was taken from two judgments, but the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. MeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. OberreuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. McMillionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API