Davis v. Frapolly
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court are the motion of all defendants to strike certain irrelevant allegations from plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), and the motion of defendants, Robert Cher-nik and Edward Kopsky 2 to dismiss Counts II through V of the complaint, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), based upon the passage of the one year statute of limitations specified in Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 85, H 8-101.
Defendants’ motion to strike certain irrelevant allegations is denied. The Second Amended Complaint does contain surplus-age. Yet, many of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Carl Sandburg Village Condominium Association No. 1, Plaintiffs v. First Condominium Development Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richard Worthington, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Dave Wilson and Jeff Wall, and Village of Peoria Heights, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Dunn v. Borough of MountainsideNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Villalobos v. FavaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Bray v. Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Edwards v. Two Unknown Male Chicago Police OfficersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.