Legal Opinion

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Same

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 25, 1943No. 7824, 7825PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

This is a three-cornered contest on a policy of life insurance, involving the insurer, the mother and the wife of the insured, Alexander T. Saxe. His wife Jane Saxe, now Mrs. Ross, was the original beneficiary and recovered judgment on the policy after a jury trial. She remarried about a year and a half after Saxe’s death. His mother, Gertrude T. Saxe, intervened, claiming the proceeds, or half of them, by virtue of alleged changes, shortly before her son’s death, making her beneficiary. The insurance company hereafter called Prudential or the insurer, contests…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Diamond Service Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Briggs v. United Services Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Roy Louis Jannenga v. Nationwide Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  5. Sastre v. Cabrera RaldirisSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API