Legal Opinion
Charles H. Keating v. Robert Hood Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1999No. 98-55468PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER.
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Most readers of this opinion will be well acquainted with the activities of Charles Keating, whose corporations, American Continental Corporation and Lincoln Savings & Loan, bilked elderly individuals out of millions of dollars of savings by selling them worthless savings bonds. Keating was prosecuted in both federal and state court, and sentenced to substantial terms of imprisonment, to be served concurrently. He ultimately spent five years in prison. His federal and state trials were…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Victor Manuel Solis v. Rosie GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Julio GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Fields v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.