Legal Opinion
Hollars v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1990No. 10475PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Larry Douglas Hollars (plaintiff) appeals an order dismissing his claims with prejudice. Although defendant Southern Pacific Transportation Company (the Company) moved for dismissal of the claims pursuant to SCRA 1986, 1-012(B)(6), the trial court treated the motion as one for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s complaint stated claims for: (1) benefits under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. Section 51 et seq. (1982); (2) libel and slander; (3) negligence; (4) malicious prosecution; (5) abuse of process; and (6) violation of the New Mexico Racketeering…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Handy v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Gioia v. Pinkerton's, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2002