Legal Opinion

Ralph E Hughes v. Douglas K Martin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2002No. CV-02-0222-AP/ELPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This nomination petition challenge asks us to determine whether propositions 101 and 107, both adopted by voters in the 1992 election, conflict. We conclude the propositions do not conflict and that, taken together, they provide that a person elected as mine inspector serves for a four-year term and is limited to four consecutive terms.

I

¶ 2 In 1992, the voters adopted two amendments to Article 19 of the Arizona Constitution concerning the office of mine inspector. Proposition 101, a House concurrent resolution referred to voters, stated that the mine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Transportation Insuarnce v. BruiningArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Erica Krystal RigginsArizona Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API