The MOVIE 1 & 2 v. United Artists Communications, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING STATE CLAIMS
AGUILAR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, a Santa Cruz movie theatre, sued two competing motion picture exhibitors and nineteen film distributors alleging antitrust violations of the Sherman Act and pendent state claims. The defendants’ simultaneously brought four separate summary judgment motions which came on for hearing December 11,1987. The Court has received, read, and considered all papers submitted on the motions, and in addition, heard the argument of counsel. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS the summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Movie 1 & 2 v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Houser v. Fox Theatres Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Houser v. Fox Theatres Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Movie 1 v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990