Herendeen v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This appeal concerns a subpoena for records served on two licensed psychologists, Dr. Dennis Herendeen and Dr. Samuel Haskell, and The Psychology Center, a professional corporation. We granted this interlocutory appeal to consider the scope of the psychologist-patient privilege, OCGA§ 43-39-16. Here, we apply it to an attempted production by a defendant in a criminal proceeding arising out of facts developed in a Department of Family and Children Services (DFACS) investigation and deprivation petition. In light of the Georgia Supreme Court’s recent holding in Lucas v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christenson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- In the Interest of L. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Kimble v. KimbleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HerendeenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Herendeen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006