Legal Opinion

State v. Herendeen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 23, 2005No. S04G1788PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENHAM, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in order to review its decision concerning the scope of the psychologist-patient privilege provided in OCGA §§ 24-9-21 (6) and 43-39-16. See Herendeen v. State, 268 Ga. App. 113 (601 SE2d 372) (2004).

Drs. Dennis Herendeen and Sam Haskell are licensed psychologists practicing in Douglasville, Georgia. In May 2003, the psychologists and The Psychology Center, a professional corporation, received a subpoena to appear before the Douglas County grand jury and to bring with them “all records and transcripts on patients [A. R]…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. In the Interest of L. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mincey v. Georgia Department of Community AffairsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Neuman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Cooksey v. LandrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API