Rogers & Thornton v. Otto Gas Engine Works
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Trover; from city court of Douglas — Judge Roan. December 1, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The Otto Gas Engine Works brought suit in trover against Rogers & Thornton for the recovery of an engine sold under retention of title. The defendants filed a plea alleging failure of consideration, damages for breach of warranty, and other breaches of contract by the plaintiff; also setting up partial payments. The action was proceeding in a city «court, and, upon the plaintiff's electing to take the specified property, the judge struck the defendants’ pleas and excluded the evidence offered thereunder, on the ground that the action was purely one at law — his holding being that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Harden v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Milltown Lumber Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Jeffersonville v. Cotton States Belting & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Hall v. SOUTHERN SALES COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Finance Co. of the South v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Spiers v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Cowart v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.