S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Chief Judge:
In these consolidated cases under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq., we are again presented with the question whether an employer whose conduct is in compliance with the custom and practice of its industry may be found to have violated 29 C.F.R. § 1926.-28(a),1 the primary OSHA regulation pertaining to the provision of personal protective equipment to employees in the construction industry. We have re-examined our earlier cases on this issue, and we reaffirm our conclusion in these cases that, at least in the absence of a clear articulation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cape and Vineyard Division of the New Bedford Gas and Edison Light Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Diebold, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stieberger v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United Nuclear Corp. v. CannonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982
- S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission and Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Standard Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission and Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981