Legal Opinion

Mart v. Mart

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided October 17, 2012No. 11-0658PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanilson, J.

Farmland landlords appeal from the denial of this forcible entry and detainer action. Where the farm tenant cured his material breach by restoration of wetlands and the landlords1 incurred no damages, the landlords are not entitled to forcible entry and detainer.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

George Mart previously owned the leased property at issue here-240 acres of farmland in Dickinson County. Dennis Mart, Thomas Mart,' Cheryl Mart, and Mike Mart are the children of George.

On March 30, 1987, 8.7 acres (sitting in two different spots) of the farmland were determined to be “converted…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Charles Gunn v. United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Dickson v. Hubbell Realty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. Jamison v. KnosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Woodbury County Soil Conservation District v. OrtnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. McNeece v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gardiner Farms, LLC v. Advanced Agric., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Gardiner Farms, LLC v. Advanced Agriculture, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API