Legal Opinion
Woodbury County Soil Conservation District v. Ortner
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 30, 1979No. 61866PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LeGRAND, Justice.
This appeal involves a dispute concerning the obligation of landowners to comply with the provisions of eh. 467A, The Code, 1975, commonly referred to as the Soil Conservation Districts Law. The trial court found § 467A.44 of the act, and the section fixing the rules and regulations under which the soil conservation district operates, unconstitutional. We reverse the trial court and remand the ease for further proceedings.
The defendants Ortner and Schrank each own farm land in Woodbury County. In 1974, an adjacent landowner, John C. Matt, filed a complaint with the soil…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Northwestern Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Benschoter v. HakesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Montgomery v. Bremer County Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Incorporated City of Denison v. ClabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Gravert v. NebergallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Kasparek v. Johnson County Board of HealthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.