Legal Opinion
CA Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cosumnes Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 18, 2024No. 2:20-cv-01703Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER No. 2:20-cv-1703 SCR ALLIANCE, 12 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 COSUMNES CORPORATION dba MURIETA EQUESTRIAN CENTER, 16 17 Defendant. 18 19 Each of the parties in this case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate 20 Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned for 21 all purposes. ECF No. 17. Now before the Court are three motions: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion for 22 leave to file a Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 113); 2)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.