Krementz v. Howard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Garnishment proceedings by George Krementz and another against Robert R. Howard, as garnishee of E. G. Smith, Sons & Company. Erom a judgment for the garnishee defendant, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This action was begun by writ of garnishment in the usual form, dated March 16, 1894. The writ was served on the defendant the same day it was issued. April 3, 1894, the garnishee defendant filed his disclosure, denying the possession of any property-belonging to E. G. Smith, Sons & Co., or any indebtedness to them. April 9, 1894, plaintiffs demanded an oral examination of the garnishee defendant before a circuit court commissioner. This was had, and reported - by him. Afterwards 'a statutory issue was framed and *468tried, and a verdict returned by the jury in favor of defendant.
On the trial of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Adams v. NiemannMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Root v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Fraser v. PassageMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Flynn v. FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Annis v. Reiser & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Carey v. NissleMichigan Supreme Court · 1906