Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of Kaminski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1990No. 1-87-3628Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE McMORROW,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent because the evidence wholly fails to sustain the trial court’s findings, relied upon by the majority. Indeed, the evidence strongly indicates that Kaminski and respondent entered into an agreement whereby respondent purchased the property in 1982 under specific terms; that between the time of sale and Kaminski’s death, Sender made payments to Kaminski totalling $10,600; and that prior to the sale to him, Sender cared for the property and made repairs to it. I dissent because the record does not support the trial court’s finding that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McFail v. BradenIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kester v. CrillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Clark v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. McGlaughlin v. PickerelIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API