Robinson v. State

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault and assessed punishment at confinement for life. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Two grounds of error are urged. The first contends that the trial court should have found that the officers did not have probable cause to arrest appellant without a warrant because there was no showing that the informant who gave the information leading to the arrest was credible or that the officers had sufficient grounds to believe him to be credible.

In passing upon this contention it is only necessary to observe…