Legal Opinion

Kurschus v. PaineWebber, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 12, 1998No. 95 Civ. 1652 (PKL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Eric Kurschus (“Kurschus”) brings this action against defendants Brian Sager, Marlene Sager, the County of Nassau, and John Does 1 through 10 (various police officers, police detectives, and employees of Nassau County), alleging violation of his civil rights under Title 42, United States Code (“U.S.C.”), Section 1983, and various state-law torts. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND 1

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Chimurenga v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Preston v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Sylvester v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Weststar Mortgage Corp. v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API