Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Western Union Tel. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 1911No. 7765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Laurens, Fall term, 1910. Action by S. B. Goodman against Western Union Telegraph Company. Plaintiff appeals from order of nonsuit. cite: Contributory negligence is for the jury: 82 S. C. 863. cites: The act ivas that of a fellow servant and plaintiff cannot recover: 71 S. C.. 54; 77 S. C. 334; 70 S. C; 95; 72 S. C. 237; 54 L. R. A. 41; 82 S. C. 360. Plaintiff contributed to his injury and cannot recover: 138 Fed. 728; 54 S. E. 110; 38 S. E. 350; 36 S. E.…

Read the full summary

Before Shipp, J., Laurens, Fall term, 1910. Action by S. B. Goodman against Western Union Telegraph Company. Plaintiff appeals from order of nonsuit. cite: Contributory negligence is for the jury: 82 S. C. 863. cites: The act ivas that of a fellow servant and plaintiff cannot recover: 71 S. C.. 54; 77 S. C. 334; 70 S. C; 95; 72 S. C. 237; 54 L. R. A. 41; 82 S. C. 360. Plaintiff contributed to his injury and cannot recover: 138 Fed. 728; 54 S. E. 110; 38 S. E. 350; 36 S. E. 926; 77 S. C. 334; 64 S. C. 215; 55 S. C. 488.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action for damages, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant.

The’ allegations of the complaint, material to the questions under consideration, are as follows:

“That the plaintiff was on the'30th day of November, 1905, in the employ of the defendant, engaged in the work of erecting a telegraph line, and was assisting in stringing a wire of the defendant, on poles which had been erected for that purpose; and, under the orders and instructions of the defendant, the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brabham v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  2. Berley v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. C. E. Rippy & Co. v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boling v. Woodside Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Wesley v. Holly Hill Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Hill v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Leopard v. Beaver Duck MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  5. Maddox v. Steel Heddle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API