Legal Opinion · Dissent

Owego Township v. Pfingsten

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2018No. 20170190Published

1DissentTufte, Justice

[¶ 39] The Majority thoroughly documents the statutory procedure for township takings of road rights-of-way. I do not dispute that Owego Township was quite meticulous in its adherence to the process required in N.D.C.C. ch. 24-07. I would conclude, however, that Pfingsten's appeal was timely because N.D. Const. art. I, § 16, delayed the beginning of the appeal period until the Township's payment completed the taking.

[¶ 40] The crux of my disagreement with the Majority is its conclusion, at ¶ 26, that "the record does not establish that the Township took possession of Pfingsten's property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Donovan v. AllertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kessler v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Haman v. McHenry CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Haveluck v. State, N.D. St. Hwy. Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API