Town of Rost v. O'Connor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant appealed from the judgment of a justice court for $79.28 to the district coutí for Jackson county. The appeal was heard by Dean, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The town board of supervisors of the town of Rost, Jackson county, on July 13, 1914, acting under the authority conferred by chapter 225, § 73, p. 278, Laws 1913 (G. S. 1913, § 2560), made and promulgated an ex parte order, to the effect that the public interests required the removal of certain trees standing in a highway as it extended along the farm of defendant. Defendant was thereafter notified of the order by “registered mail,” and directed to “cut down the trees and take them off *82the highway within 90 days of this notice.” If defendant received the notice, he gave it no attention and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Newman v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Viliski v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State ex rel. County of Murray v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- West v. Village of White BearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Zacharias v. NesbittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Powell v. Township of CarlosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Pederson v. City of RushfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.