Legal Opinion

Hanrahan v. New York Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The plaintiff was struck and injured by a commercial automobile, > which on two trials has been identified by the jury as an automobile which was operated by one Gleason and which transported an employee of the defendant over a route of inspection.

The vital issue presented upon this appeal is whether Gleason, by whose negligent operation of the automobile the plaintiff was injured, was a servant of the defendant. As was said by the Court of Appeals in passing on an appeal from a judgment heretofore recovered by the plaintiff herein (238 N. Y. 194), “ The question whose employee…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation of Long IslandNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. SayOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dagley v. National Cloak & Suit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Paquet v. Pictorial Review Holding Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API