Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Alouette Peat Products, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1957No. Nos. 15276, 15277PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. D. MURRAY, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court reversing orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission dismissing complaints before the Commission seeking recovery of alleged overcharges in freight charges for the transportation of peat from British Columbia points to destinations in the *451United States. The District Court held in effect that the rates in question were unlawful because not established as directed by the statute (49 U.S.C.A. Sec. 6, Par. 3), and resulted in overcharges to the shippers, which they were entitled to recover. The judgment ordered…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. American Trucking Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N. Bebchick and Daniel W. Gottlieb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company & Other Railroads v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API