Legal Opinion
United States v. Geelan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 31, 1974No. Nos. 74-1048, 73-1869, 74-1074 and 74-1073PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, Circuit Judge.
These criminal appeals have been consolidated because they present one common question: whether the delay of the District Clerk1 in implementing the 1972 amendments to the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968 caused juries to be empaneled so contrary to law as to mandate reversal of convictions by such juries. Other non-common assignments of error will be considered separately.
In each of the consolidated cases a motion had been filed in which the defendants sought a stay of proceedings on the *739ground that the master jury wheel from which jurors would be chosen for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Joe Davis TwilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dale Joseph MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Kenny Eugene SmartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.