Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Stanger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1892No. 587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The complaint in this case was in two paragraphs. A demurrer was filed to each paragraph, and overruled. A general denial was then filed, and, upon the issue thus joined, the case was tried by a jury. Upon *180a proper motion, made, a special verdict was returned. Upon the facts thus found, the court gave judgment in favor of the appellee.

At the proper time the appellant filed a motion for a venire de novo, also a motion for a judgment 'in his favor upon the special verdict. Both these motions were overruled by the court. A motion for a new trial was also filed and overruled.

Proper exceptions to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Culp v. Atchison & Nebraska RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. DammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Effinger v. Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Richter v. Cicero & Proviso St. Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  4. Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API