Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Stanger
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
The complaint in this case was in two paragraphs. A demurrer was filed to each paragraph, and overruled. A general denial was then filed, and, upon the issue thus joined, the case was tried by a jury. Upon *180a proper motion, made, a special verdict was returned. Upon the facts thus found, the court gave judgment in favor of the appellee.
At the proper time the appellant filed a motion for a venire de novo, also a motion for a judgment 'in his favor upon the special verdict. Both these motions were overruled by the court. A motion for a new trial was also filed and overruled.
Proper exceptions to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Culp v. Atchison & Nebraska RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. DammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Effinger v. Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Richter v. Cicero & Proviso St. Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897
- Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911