Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Campbell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

These four actions of tort were tried together and come before us on the consolidated bill of exceptions of the defendant. They grew out of a collision on the highway in this Commonwealth, on September 24, 1930, between an automobile owned by the original defendant, since deceased, and an automobile owned by the plaintiff Clarence J. Peabody and operated by the plaintiff Ellen A. Normand, in which the plaintiff Lottie Peabody, wife of the plaintiff Clarence J. Peabody, was riding. The actions were tried before an auditor who found for all four plaintiffs and assessed damages in the cases of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Libby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Worcester County National Bank v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Theriault v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Foley v. John H. Bates Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Knapp v. AmeroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Gaines v. RatnowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API