Legal Opinion

Board of Revenue v. Ikner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1924No. 1 Div. 318Published

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

J. F. Bayles and 12 others, resident freeholders, who reside within a certain district, accurately described, in beat 7, in Monroe county, by petition to the board of revenue of the county in writing, sought to have established a stock law district to prevent all stock, except sheep, from running at large therein. The petition accurately described the district, and it was a part of beat 7. The petition was filed under an act approved February 28, 1881 [Acts 18S0-81, p. 163], and the board of revenue of Monroe county at the hearing of the cause under the authority conferred by section 3 of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  2. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Winter v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. City Council v. National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Dunn v. Court of County RevenuesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API