Legal Opinion
Smith v. Schultz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1989No. W89-668PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
546 So.2d 596 (1989)
Sampson B. SMITH
v.
Meredith SCHULTZ, et al.
No. W89-668.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
June 22, 1989.
Gold, Weems, Sam N. Poole, Alexandria, for defendant/applicant.
Edward A. Kaplan, Alexandria, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before FORET, KNOLL and KING, JJ.
WRIT DENIED: La.C.C. Art. 3071 requires that contracts of compromise must be reduced to writing to be valid and enforceable. See Vest v. Hartford Acc. & Indent. Co., 493 So.2d 877 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1986) and Lytle v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, N.J., 285 So.2d 289 (La. App. 3 Cir.1973). The exhibits in this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lytle v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- F&S EQUIP. CO. v. Intern. Matex Tank TerminalsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Vest v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bennett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Dammann v. MoleroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Tastet v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C v. Merryton Bossier L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025