Wal-Mart v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case the respondent insurance carrier takes issue with the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) resolution of conflicting testimony and questions whether a physician’s assistant is qualified to testify as an expert.
The facts, taken in the light most favorable to affirming the award, are as follows. On February 17, 1993, Patrick Power was injured during the course of his employment with Wal-Mart when a Coke machine he was helping to move upstairs slipped, pinning him beneath it. He filed a claim for workers’ compensation and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Baroldy v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Kaibab Industries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Phoenix union/az School v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Pierce v. allstate/copperptCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. Carlson - Criminal No. 960070North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.