Legal Opinion
Romero v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided June 8, 1990No. A-2980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
George M. Romero appeals after being convicted by a jury of guiding without a valid license, in violation of former AS 08.-54.210(a)(6). Under former AS 08.54.-210(b), the offense was a class C felony. Romero contends that the legislature did not intend this statute to apply to a person guiding with an expired license. Romero also alleges that the imposition of felony sanctions violated his right to equal protection. We reverse.
The relevant facts are undisputed. Romero worked as a licensed assistant guide from 1980 through 1986. Late in 1986, he applied for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Brookins v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Best v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- McLean v. Hyland Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Briggs v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- Eppenger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
- Glasgow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
- Tuckfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.