Legal Opinion
Dunnington v. First Atlantic Nat. Bank of Daytona Beach
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 15, 1952No. 13674PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
This appeal from a summary judgment entered on defendant’s motion, as all other such appeals do, presents for our decision the single question whether, on the record 1 before him, the district judge was right in holding: that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact; and that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
In explanation of his judgment, the district judge filed this memorandum:
“The plaintiff’s conduct, and not that of the defendant, was the cause of the penalty, interest and attorney’s fees for which plaintiff seeks recovery. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Haywood Lumber & Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Weisser v. Mursam Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Kaufman v. Kaufman's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Margaret S. Rodriguez v. Donald E. RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation and the Whiting-Turner Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Louise W. Gesing and St. Stanislaus Novitiate of Parma, Ohio v. Grand Rapids Hardware Company and Detroit Hardware Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Margaret S. Rodriguez v. Donald E. RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- The Greyhound Corporation v. Excess Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.