Legal Opinion

Blocker v. Conocophillips Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 2019No. Case No. CIV-17-248-GPublished

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge *1068This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 125) filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In their Motion, Plaintiffs seek summary adjudication of their claims of negligence per se and public nuisance per se , as well as certain affirmative defenses. The Motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition. See Def.'s Resp. (Doc. No. 159); Pls.' Reply (Doc. No. 179).

STANDARD OF DECISION

Summary judgment is a means of testing in advance of trial whether the available…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Self v. OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API