Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Pedigo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1965No. 5555PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, P. J.

An appeal on questions of law and fact brings this ease before us.

A series of claimed violations of zoning regulations is said to be taking place on lands owned by Martin VanBuren Pedigo and Myrtle E. Pedigo, two of the several appellants herein. Violations of the zoning regulations are also claimed against tenants of the owners, i. e., Richfield Motors, Inc., and D. J. Cass, doing business as Richfield Garage and Service.

Specifically, the appellee, John F. Stewart, as Zoning Inpector for Richfield Township, seeks an injunction against the appellants, alleging that they:

“* * * jointly,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McVey v. ReichleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Steudel v. TrobergOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Susman v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marietta v. Washington Cty. Woman's Home Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Deerfield Twp v. Deerfield Raceway, 2007-P-0060 (8-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API