State v. Lasley
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Foth, C.:
Defendant was convicted of first degree robbery and he appeals. His sole contention is that certain evidence admitted at his trial was acquired as the result of an illegal search and seizure and should have been suppressed on his pre-trial motion.
The state justifies the search and seizure as being incidental to a lawful arrest. Defendant counters by alleging that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to make the arrest, and this is the issue on which the case turns.
On June 6, 1970, shortly before 12:30 p. m. an attendant at John’s Derby…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- State v. BloodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976