Sweeney v. Vaudry
Missouri Court of Appeals
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Wag.. Stat. 143, sees. 1, 6 ; Bridgman v. Bridgman, 23 Mo. 272 ;■ Tucker v. Allen, 47 Mo. 488 ; Howard v. Saxton, 1 Denio,. 440 ; Graham v. Graham, 9 Pa. St. 254; French v. New, 20 Barb. 481; Woods v. Page, 37 Vt. 252; White vLobinsón, 60 III. 499; MeShaw v. Gray, 13 Iowa, 504; Abridge v. Patillo, 44 Ga. 585 ; Blanchard v. Murray, 15' Vt. 548 ; Bemus v. Clark, 29 Pa.
Read the full summary
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Wag.. Stat. 143, sees. 1, 6 ; Bridgman v. Bridgman, 23 Mo. 272 ;■ Tucker v. Allen, 47 Mo. 488 ; Howard v. Saxton, 1 Denio,. 440 ; Graham v. Graham, 9 Pa. St. 254; French v. New, 20 Barb. 481; Woods v. Page, 37 Vt. 252; White vLobinsón, 60 III. 499; MeShaw v. Gray, 13 Iowa, 504; Abridge v. Patillo, 44 Ga. 585 ; Blanchard v. Murray, 15' Vt. 548 ; Bemus v. Clark, 29 Pa. St. 251; Norton v. Savage, 10 Mo. 455,- Knowlton v. Homer, 30 Mo. 552; Shisler v. Keavy, 75 Pa. St. 79 ; Cutler m Whittemore, 10 Mass'. 442 ;• Taylor v. Zepp, 14 Mo. 482 ; Eutherford v.…
1Opinion of the CourtBaicewell, J.
This is a motion for a judgment upon an award of arbitrators. Plaintiff in error and defendants in error filed with the record the following agreed statement of the case :
On June 5, 1874, plaintiff and defendants, in order to settle a business controversy (and being both members of an association called the “ Cotton Association of the City of St. Louis ”), executed an agreement of submission to arbitrators, the material parts of which are as follows :
The parties agreed “ to submit said difference and controversy to the arbitrament and decision of J. L. Sloss, N. Comma, F. B. Daviclson, Ii. S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tucker v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Bowen v. LazalereSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Bulson v. . LohnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Akridge v. PatilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Pearce v. DansforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fernandes Grain Co. v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Arbitration of Pope Construction Co. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- Reeves v. McGlochlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896