Legal Opinion

Bulson v. . Lohnes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1864PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Only two of the three arbitrators chosen met and heard the proofs and allegations of the parties. The third had due notice of the time and place of hearing, and appeared there, but declined publicly to take any part whatever in the proceedings, and did not remain or act during the trial. The award was afterward made by the two, before whom the matters submitted were heard. The question to be determined is, whether the award thus made is valid, and can be enforced by action.

The submission was to three arbitrators, with a provision that the award should be in writing signed by the three, "or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Wells v. LaneCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  3. Bloomer v. ShermanNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  4. M'Inroy v. BenedictNew York Supreme Court · 1814

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Bullard & Morgan H. Grace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In re the Arbitration between American Eagle Fire Insurance & New Jersey InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Matter of A.E. Fire Ins. Co. v. N.J. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Toledo S. S. Co. v. Zenith Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Day v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API