Legal Opinion

Bolin v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2014-000461; No. 5361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeathers, J.

Appellant Michael Bolin (Inmate) challenges a decision of the South Carolina Administrative Law Court (ALC) upholding a determination of the South Carolina Department of Corrections (DOC) that Inmate must serve eighty-five percent of his sentence before he is eligible for early release, discharge, or community supervision. Inmate argues that the eighty-five-percent requirement of section 24-13-150 of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2015) does not apply to any of the offenses to which he pled guilty because they are not considered “no-parole offenses.” We reverse the ALC’s decision.

FACTS/PROCEDXJ…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Beaufort County v. South Carolina State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Hair v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marion Campbell v. Chris FlorianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ponder v. CohenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API