Legal Opinion

Pope v. Alabama Power Co. (In Re Alabama State Fair Authority)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 23, 1997No. 19-40158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Chapter 9 Adversary Proceeding

BENJAMIN COHEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Background

The trustee filed the pending complaint in this Chapter 9 case on December 16, 1996 contending that payments of $141,268.00 made to the defendant by the debtor constitute preference payments under 11 U.S.C. § 547. The defendant contends that the trustee’s complaint was filed beyond the two-year statute of limitations contained in 11 U.S.C. § 546 and filed the pending Motion to Dismiss on January 24,1997.

The pertinent part of the applicable version of 11 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Fry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pope v. Haas & Wilkerson, Inc. (In Re Alabama State Fair Authority)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API