Legal Opinion
Shapoor and Harriet Ardalan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 26, 1984No. 83-1413PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal by Shapoor and Harriet Ardalan, husband and wife, from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, granting summary judgment in favor of the United States and dismissing with prejudice the Ardalans’ suit for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fidelity Bank, N. A. v. United States v. Fidelity Bank, N. A., on Counterclaim-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- White v. CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Walter W. Flora v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lucy Freck, A/K/A Lucy Cameron v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Mires v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Diversified Group Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Harold D. Curry and Magdalene Curry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Cromar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.