Legal Opinion
Heintz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1930No. A-7763PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Washita county on a charge of having the possession of a still and was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.
The prosecution in this case is under an' information in part as follows:
“In the name and by the authority of the state of Oklahoma, now comes M. W. Ludington the duly qualified and acting assistant county attorney, in and for Wash-ita county, state of Oklahoma, and gives the county court of Washita county and state of Oklahoma to know and be informed that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evans v. Willis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- McGarrah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Viers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Oelke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935