Legal Opinion

Heintz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1930No. A-7763PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Washita county on a charge of having the possession of a still and was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The prosecution in this case is under an' information in part as follows:

“In the name and by the authority of the state of Oklahoma, now comes M. W. Ludington the duly qualified and acting assistant county attorney, in and for Wash-ita county, state of Oklahoma, and gives the county court of Washita county and state of Oklahoma to know and be informed that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evans v. Willis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. McGarrah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Viers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Oelke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API